Who knew that since 2008, Sen John McCain was one of the original birthers?
Well that's what we're led to believe in The Daily Beast article by Yashar Ali (linked below) which he is led to believe by the Trump Organization's biography of its founder, Donald Trump.
Can we stop with the birther crap please, I beg of you, stop!!!!!
The Big "O" ain't running for a third term and a Hillary first term won't equate to one either so basically Obama is a known factor. Well only in the mindset that you're tired of 8 years of Democratic executive action or lack there of.
The regurgitated birther argument does nothing in this election cycle, it holds zero water. We need to be focusing on policy and not that Donnie runs around like real life version of Victor Newman and hiring private eyes and security teams to scour the world for proof of Obama's birth, regardless that was in the State of Hawaii.
Yet the latest chapter of birthering claims that McCain and Hillary are the original birthers because "they failed to never question Obama's on his birth certificate."
WTF?
The logic of this claim is mind-numbing. So my guess is that McCain and Hillary planted the birther seed but never got their hands dirty, so it took someone with guts and patriotism like Donnie to go forth and find the truth.
Um people we do know that Donnie is fanatical about having his name in headlines 24/7 and will say & do anything to be there.
Call it a falsehood, Pinocchio, or how about just plain old bullshit, regardless with a about a month to go Donnie needs to shut up/nut up and talk about policy, not anything that pops up in 'lil Donnie's head.
Friday, October 7, 2016
Thursday, October 6, 2016
A Colorado mom took her disabled child to a Trump rally..... Please there are no jokes here, but her story shows how some supporters are giving merit to the stereotyping of the ignorant Donnie supporter. This story has yet to go into the MSM reporting, but has been reported on a local level and even made the smaller partisan interweb sites. If it were not reported on a local level, I would've waved my hand to it.
As the story goes, Ms Mau is the mother of a disabled child and an undecided voter. She is not supporting either Hillary or Donnie, but wanted to attend a Donnie rally to experience for herself and not live by the soundbites so many thrive by. So with daughter in tow she made her way to local rally.
While sitting in a section for those that are disabled for 20 minutes, she felt she had heard enough and decided to leave, not causing a commotion on her exit until she was asked why she was leaving by another attendee in her section. Struck by such a question she promptly answered "why are you here, he makes fun of people like you" And that's where the story makes its dramatic turn.
As Ms Mau was led away by Secret Service, wait why Secret Service and not Event Security, she was followed by two groups; those that were in the same thought as her and those too heckle her as she trotted off. As Ms Mau states "She was screaming and yelling at me, saying that if I loved my daughter I would vote for Trump and I need to get educated because he didn't mock somebody on purpose."
OK stop right there, on purpose or not, mocking anyone with a disability is completely wrong and a groveling plea of forgiveness just ain't enough in my book. As a father of a child on the Autism Spectrum and for many years prior, I truly hate when people use the term "retarded" in any use. So I guess Sarah Palin and I have something in common, except she gives the ok for certain parties to use the term, such as Rush Limbaugh.
As I stated in the opening paragraph, it's these type of people that pigeon hole ALL. Not all Donnie supporters are "deplorable" to steal a line from Hillary. There are many that are upstanding individuals and I refuse to throw everyone into one basket. The same goes for Hillary supporters as well. Yet it's easier to make a point to lump everyone together that is completely in the wrong.
For Ms Mau's experience, I hope she doesn't lump all as one and is able to segregate the idiots from the rest.
It seems several times a year, especially when we near Christmas time, there's a story of an irate parent foaming at the mouth about 'lil Timmy or Susie learning about religions other than just Christianity in their Social Studies class. Let me correct myself, it's only one religion, Islam, that has these parents wagging their finger and running to the nearest news crew.
STFU!
We never hear from about a Jewish parent upset of their child learning about Islam, why is that?
So the latest bitch and moan comes out of Kingsport, Tennessee where a mother declared the teaching of Islam in her 7th grade daughter's Social Studies class was a violation of her religious belief. This leads me to question Mommie Dearest by asking had the other religions taught not done the same as well?
Religion of any sort has shaped regions and caused major wars throughout World History. Why shouldn't children learn this, after all, too many Christianity helped shape the early US beginnings.
Are parents truly concerned that their child will become sympathetic or decide to convert to Islam after a few hours in the classroom? Well dammit, you better petition to stop American History classes from teaching of Salem, Mass or some kid might become sympathetic to witches and decide to turn to Wicca.
Look I get it, Islam is a horrible deplorable vicious religion or so we're told in Social Media and certain Talking heads. It's a hated religion by many. But maybe it's those that pervert the religion that should be hated and not the religion, especially if you personally are not properly educated about it. Because you cannot honestly tell me no one has ever perverted the Christian religion in their own disturbed way and caused harmed towards others.
Wednesday, October 5, 2016
So if two things are guaranteed; death and taxes, and Donnie was able to cheat taxes can he cheat death?
Ok I know he didn't cheat on his taxes but was able to use existing tax laws and loopholes to his advantage. Anyone would, hell I know people who bicker at work trying to figure out more deductions and such.
But I'm still surprised that 4 days later I have not heard whispers of Flat/ Fair tax reasoning as a better alternative since Congress can never agree on tax reform and fight on loopholes.
I give Pence kudos... He acted more presidential then his running mate.. He knew how to absorb attacks, dust off and go back into the chaos.. He also showed how to calmly lay some smack down without looking like a pompous ass..
I hope Kelly Anne Conway and Co took notes for Donnie for Sunday night town hall style debate
I hope Kelly Anne Conway and Co took notes for Donnie for Sunday night town hall style debate
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Why I’m politically brewed and not a common law fan?
I love the smell of political campaigns in the Fall. The sprouting of political yard signs, the candidate pandering, the pundit ass kissing, the “Never will until now” bandwagon supporters and the many WTF discussions that truly has me wondering about the spectator sport of American politics and the common law fan.
Honestly I don’t know which is the biggest and enjoyable spectacle to watch; the RNC/DNC Convention cheerleading or the March of the Fatigued (parents/children) at Disney?
I admit that yes I have never been a good foot soldier in the political arena (nor in life) when I had party affiliation, simply because I never showed party loyalty and never voted the “party line.” I’ve always carried a “Social Liberal/Fiscal Conservative” political mentality which is despised by many as being noncommittal, yet it’s that type of mentality that has helped major legislation get passed and keeping government out of gridlock. So slap a “scarlet letter” on me, call me a RINO/Blue Dog, because I simply don’t care.
Generally a majority of the Left/Right loyalists argue who is the worst while ignoring their own part inadequacies, guzzle their affiliated juice boxes, follow whatever their favorite talking head spews to them for 60 to 180 minutes (the time limit depends on the format you get news from), and unable to take a joke as there is a growing group of voter who are leaving the two party system. Well leaving the two party system in name only.
The last time I checked, research has shown that 43% of registered voters are considered “politically independent,” yet that number is a bit misleading. As John Sides stated in his 2009 article The Monkey Cage;
“Most independents are closet partisans. This has been well-known in political science since at least 1992. The vast majority of independents state that they lean toward a political party. They are the “independent leaners… The number of pure independents is actually quite small—perhaps 10% or so of the population. And this number has been decreasing, not increasing, since the mid-1970s. There is very little difference between independent leaners and weak partisans. Approximately 75% of independent leaners are loyal partisans.”
That’s right(!) the many that have disaffiliated their party still carry the party soapbox. In a bad analogy it’s like being antisocial but wanting to be part of the party, you still go just hang out outside.
Now I’m not quite positive that I fit into the “leaner” description because I tend to educate myself on issue and make a decision from that, although many will say I lean left. Just because I feel whatever party is correct is not part of the equation. However over the past 30 or so years the growing trend of swapping affiliation has become less on reason but more of fad and I can point to Glenn Beck as example.
Simple to say the within the past 6 years Beck has gone from Conservative to Independent to Libertarian to whatever he claims to be now as he follows the demographics not for his own “belief” but for ratings. It’s what the cool boys and girls are doing, so let’s play along. Lately that business mentality has not done Beck’s pocketbook any good.
How about another good example? After 9/11, Republicans saw a rise in registration while the opposite happened for the Democrats. The upswing in the so-called “9/11 Republicans” as they began to be known was simply because of national security as people registered to vote or “people who usually voted Democratic, but have been taken in by the Bush administration's fear-mongering” as the definition states.
Remember kids; too flip flop is to Democrat… Too negotiate or educate is to Republican.
Gotta love labels.
It’s safe to say that political loyalty has turned into political schizophrenia and for some that have swapped out it’s a little bit of political tourettes.
But the discourse is one having an open mind/independent/unaffiliated political mindset is pretty evident, well at least towards me on Social Media. For all the posts and open debate, I get more grief from Conservatives then I do Liberals. Then again when it comes to mockery, Liberals have thicker skin then their Conservative counterpart, whom seem quick to set up defenses and followed by the hurling the insults, at least in my experience.
So why am I so disliked? Better question is do I care if I’m liked or not?
Truthfully personally I don’t care if I’m liked politically, personally or professionally. I call it as I see it and that’s by educating myself as well as understanding the issue as a whole. I keep telling people “don’t live by the sound bite or the headline porn, read the entire, actually listen and not go by what you’re being told by the floating political head on your media source.”
Yet for many that’s all they need to live by, the “Right Said/Left Said” mentality. And because of that reasoning is why we have a dysfunctional government and people believe the words of a candidate when they say “I’m going to change Washington” yet so few have done so.
So what do I believe in that upsets people:
1. I have no issue with the right to gun ownership even though I do not own a gun, yet I believe we need to enforce the laws we currently have. I don’t see an issue with a gun owner registry or the need to put special laws in play for the mentally handicapped. Plus I like the idea Smart Gun technology which really gets under some folks skin as they see it as some sort of government intrusion
2. I have no problem with one's right to freedom of speech & freedom to protest/assemble but the moment (no matter the circumstances) a protest that turns violent/destructive/disruptive will only mute your voice to anyone. If you cannot take responsibility for your words then stay quiet. The majority of protests start peacefully, with the right intention, it takes own person to pervert the cause/throw the first stone to turn into a riot. Yet amazingly many do not see it that way
3. Yes more defense and border spending. Screw the wall talk as it’s another temp jobs program. If Congress truly wanted to strengthen border security they would’ve done so after 9/11, but it’s all part of the soapbox and when you take it away, it leaves them very little to argue on a daily basis. Defense spending needs to be more sensible because if the generals are saying we do not need any more Abrahams tanks. Yes a couple congressmen have manufacturers in their district making some nut or bolt, but do we need 3 or 4 duplication, but Congress keeps appropriating funds for more, you gotta wonder what type of government welfare program it is.
4. I’ve always like the idea of medical marijuana to be available for those that a terminally ill as I never understood the need for these patients to be doped on $1000/month of prescriptions to feel numb when cheaper marijuana oils are equal. Oops answered my own question, capitalize on the dying
5. Gay marriage does not affect my straight marriage. Let them marry. However, I also believe a business has their right to deny service. Seriously, if someone does not want the business of a cake go to someone who does. Does it really matter of Mrs. Cakes bakes to best Pumpkin Spice Triple Maple cake w/Coconut butter frosting and ya gotta have it?
6. The so-called “War on Christmas” is a farce. Is it really hurtful that someone saying “happy holidays” during Christmas? No it’s not especially with so many holidays being celebrated between Thanksgiving and New Years. If you want a “war on Christmas” you have to look at the commercialization of the holiday by retailers. It’s because of them that your child knows more about Santa then Jesus, so maybe to help stop the so-called war you need to look at your wallet first.
7. I understand the need for taxes and who the hell wouldn’t like to see a tax cut, but I lean more towards gradual tax cuts then the slash and burn people seem to gather around. Truly you only have to look at the problems with Kansas’ cash problems to understand that gradual cuts are more effective
8. I’ve shouted for Congressional/SCOTUS term limits for the longest time as many have begun the last few years. But until people open their ears, put away the “D/R” labels, and of course the opposition actually put a worthwhile candidate, we the people will be stuck with the same career politicians every campaign season. A SCOTUS term of 20 years is more than sufficient as well as a Congressional career no longer them 12 years in either Capitol Wing.
Now mind you these are only a few topics that popped up quickly in my peanut size brain for this post. I’m positive many will agree/disagree, hopefully with some intelligent conversation and not relying on “keyboard bravery” as a means to spout about.
Yet as entertaining (and mind-numbing) as this post was to write, it just makes me reflect further as to why I am so damn “politically brewed.”
That’s it, pay your political tab and remember to quench ones political thirst one must “Brew Free or Die!”
Cheers!
Thursday, September 22, 2016
www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/the-folly-of-the-protest-vote/ar-BBwtDot?li=BBnb7Kz
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)